Skip to main content Skip to main content

Church History

Confessional Texts

Primary texts with commentary: Augsburg, Trent, Heidelberg, Westminster, Barmen

Justification is the point of division between the Reformation and Rome. The confessional texts supply the most precise formulations of each position and make the depth of the divergence visible.

Augsburg Confession, article IV (1530)

“It is also taught that we cannot obtain forgiveness of sin and righteousness before God through our merit, work or satisfactions, but that we receive forgiveness of sin and become righteous before God out of grace for Christ’s sake through faith, when we believe that Christ has suffered for us and that for his sake our sin is forgiven and righteousness and eternal life are given to us. For God will regard and reckon this faith as righteousness in his sight, as St Paul says in Romans 3 and 4.”
Augsburg Confession, art. IV (1530), BSLK 56-57

This is the first official Protestant formulation of justification presented before an imperial diet. Four elements are articulated: gratuity (ex gratia), by grace and not by merit; the christological ground (propter Christum), for Christ’s sake and not by any satisfaction of one’s own; the means (per fidem), through faith; and imputation, in the words “regard and reckon,” which carry the forensic character. The appeal to Romans 3 and 4 anchors the position exegetically.

Council of Trent, session VI, canon 9 (1547)

“If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in obtaining the grace of justification, and that it is in no way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will: let him be anathema.”
Council of Trent, session VI, canon 9 (1547), DH 1559

The canon is directed at Lutheran sola fide. It does not condemn justification by faith as such, but the exclusive role assigned to faith. Trent affirms the primacy of grace while maintaining the cooperation of the human will and the necessity of the sacraments. The Joint Declaration of 1999 held that these anathemas do not touch the doctrines now taught on either side, but it did not abrogate the canon itself.

The Church and the sacraments

Augsburg Confession, article VII (1530)

“It is also taught that at all times there must be and remain one holy Christian Church, which is the assembly of all believers among whom the gospel is purely preached and the holy sacraments administered according to the gospel. It is not necessary for the true unity of the Christian Church that uniform ceremonies instituted by human beings be observed everywhere.”
Augsburg Confession, art. VII (1530), BSLK 61

The definition is ecclesiologically decisive on three counts. It is functional rather than institutional, naming neither hierarchy nor apostolic succession among the marks of the Church. It distinguishes what unity requires, doctrinal agreement, from what it does not, ceremonial uniformity. And it implies, without stating, that the medieval church is not fully Church where the gospel is not purely preached.

Westminster Confession, chapter XXIX (1647)

“Worthy receivers, outwardly partaking of the visible elements in this sacrament, do then also inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally and corporally, but spiritually, receive and feed upon Christ crucified, and all benefits of his death: the body and blood of Christ being then not corporally or carnally in, with, or under the bread and wine; yet as really, but spiritually, present to the faith of believers.”
Westminster Confession XXIX §7 (1647)

Westminster holds the Calvinist position: a real but spiritual presence of Christ in the Supper, against Lutheran sacramental union on one side and Catholic transubstantiation on the other. It is the position that emerged from the failure of Marburg in 1529, where Luther and Zwingli could not agree and where Calvin later proposed a mediation: the presence is real, its mode spiritual rather than corporeal.

Scripture and ecclesiastical authority

Westminster Confession, chapter I §4-5 (1647)

“§4. The authority of the Holy Scripture, for which it ought to be believed and obeyed, dependeth not upon the testimony of any man or church, but wholly upon God (who is truth itself), the author thereof; and therefore it is to be received, because it is the Word of God. §5. Our full persuasion and assurance of the infallible truth and divine authority thereof, is from the inward work of the Holy Spirit, bearing witness by and with the Word in our hearts.”
Westminster Confession I §4-5 (1647)

Two major themes are joined here. The first is autopistia, the self-attestation of Scripture: its authority derives from God and not from the Church, which recognises the canon without constituting it. The second is the testimonium Spiritus Sancti internum, the inward testimony of the Spirit, as the ground of subjective certainty, a theme Calvin develops in Institutes I.7.4-5. The position stands apart both from Catholicism, where the Magisterium is the authorised interpreter, and from a subjectivist pietism in which experience alone would ground certainty.

Council of Trent, decree on the canonical Scriptures (1546)

“The Synod receives and venerates with an equal affection of piety and reverence all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament, since one God is the author of both, together with the traditions themselves concerning both faith and morals, as having been received orally from Christ himself or by the dictation of the Holy Spirit and preserved in continuous succession in the Catholic Church.”
Council of Trent, session IV, De canonicis Scripturis (1546), DH 1501

The decree places Scripture and apostolic Tradition on the same footing of veneration, pari pietatis affectu ac reverentia. This is the explicit answer to sola Scriptura: not Scripture alone, but Scripture and Tradition together. The same decree declares Jerome’s Vulgate authentic, against the Protestant humanists who preferred the Greek and Hebrew originals.

Barmen (1934) and confession in the twentieth century

The Barmen Declaration, theses 1 to 3

“Thesis 1. Jesus Christ, as he is attested for us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God which we have to hear and which we have to trust and obey in life and in death. We reject the false doctrine that the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God’s revelation.

Thesis 2. The Christian Church is the congregation of brethren in which Jesus Christ acts presently as Lord in Word and sacrament through the Holy Spirit.

Thesis 3. The Church has to render its service in word and deed not according to the shifting ideological and political convictions that happen to prevail.”
Barmen Declaration (1934), theses 1-3, drafted by Karl Barth

Barmen is the most important confessional text of the twentieth century. Its force lies in the radical application of solus Christus to a concrete political situation. The first thesis excludes any revelation outside Scripture, whether race, people, history or the “orders of creation,” the favoured formula of the German Christians. It is sola Scriptura turned into a theology of resistance.

Barmen and the Confessing Church

The Declaration was adopted by the first Confessing Synod of the German Evangelical Church, meeting at Wuppertal-Barmen from 29 to 31 May 1934. It is the theological founding act of the Confessing Church in the face of National Socialist encroachment. Among its signatories were Martin Niemöller and Hans Asmussen, alongside Barth. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, engaged in the same struggle, paid for it with his life; he was executed at Flossenbürg on 9 April 1945.

Editions

  • Kolb, Robert and Timothy J. Wengert, eds. The Book of Concord. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000.
  • Cochrane, Arthur C., ed. Reformed Confessions of the 16th Century. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2003.
  • Denzinger, Heinrich and Peter Hünermann. Compendium of Creeds, Definitions, and Declarations. 43rd ed. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2012.

Studies

  • Scholder, Klaus. The Churches and the Third Reich. 2 vols. London: SCM, 1987-1988.
  • Busch, Eberhard. The Great Passion: An Introduction to Karl Barth’s Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.

Quiz — Confessional Texts

What does canon 9 of session VI of Trent (1547) condemn?

  • The use of Latin in the liturgy
  • The doctrine that the sinner is justified by faith alone, understood as requiring nothing further
  • The Calvinist doctrine of absolute predestination
  • The rejection of sacred images in places of worship

Trent, sess. VI, can. 9 (DH 1559)